There are tests that have right answers, which are returned with a number on top in a red circle, and there are tests with open-ended questions, which provide insight into the test takers mind.
In June, Dr. James Heilman posted all 10 plates on the site, along with research about the most popular responses to each.
The Rorschach test, a series of 10 inkblot plates created by the Swiss psychiatrist Hermann Rorschach for his book Psychodiagnostik, published in 1921, is clearly in the second category.
Yet in the last few months, the online encyclopedia Wikipedia has been engulfed in a furious debate involving psychologists who are angry that the 10 original Rorschach plates are reproduced online, along with common responses for each. For them, the Wikipedia page is the equivalent of posting an answer sheet to next years SAT.
They are pitted against the overwhelming majority of Wikipedias users, who share the sites free culture ethos, which opposes the suppression of information that it is legal to publish. (Because the Rorschach plates were created nearly 90 years ago, they have lost their copyright protection in the United States.)
The only winners seem to be those for whom this issue has become personal, and who see this as a game in which victory means having their way, one Wikipedia poster named Faustian wrote on Monday, adding, Just dont pretend you are doing anything other than harming scientific research.
What had been a simmering dispute over the reproduction of a single plate reached new heights in June when James Heilman, an emergency-room doctor from Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan, posted images of all 10 plates to the bottom of the article about the test, along with what research had found to be the most popular responses for each.
I just wanted to raise the bar whether one should keep a single image on Wikipedia seemed absurd to me, so I put all 10 up, Dr. Heilman said in an interview. The debate has exploded from there.
Psychologists have registered with Wikipedia to argue that the site is jeopardizing one of the oldest continuously used psychological assessment tests.
While the plates have appeared on other Web sites, it was not until they showed up on the popular Wikipedia site that psychologists became concerned.
The more test materials are promulgated widely, the more possibility there is to game it, said Bruce L. Smith, a psychologist and president of the International Society of the Rorschach and Projective Methods, who has posted under the user name SPAdoc. He quickly added that he did not mean that a coached subject could fool the person giving the test into making the wrong diagnosis, but rather render the results meaningless.
To psychologists, to render the Rorschach test meaningless would be a particularly painful development because there has been so much research conducted tens of thousands of papers, by Dr. Smiths estimate to try to link a patients responses to certain psychological conditions. Yes, new inkblots could be used, these advocates concede, but those blots would not have had the research the normative data, in the language of researchers that allows the answers to be put into a larger context.
And, more fundamentally, the psychologists object whenever diagnostic tools fall into the hands of amateurs who havent been trained to administer them. Our ethics code that governs the behavior of psychologists talks about maintaining test security, Steve J. Breckler, the executive director for science at the American Psychological Association, said in an interview. We wouldnt be in favor of putting the plates out where anyone can get hold of them.
Alvin G. Burstein, a professor emeritus of psychology at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, wrote in an e-mail message that his preference was to have the images removed but that he did not think they would harm the psychological process.
The process of making sense of ones experience, he wrote, is gratifying. To take Rorschachs test is to make sense of ambiguity in the context of someone who is interested in how you do that.
